Let me preface this article by saying that, this is NOT about if you Can or Cannot drink this beer. It is NOT about if you have symptoms or not; most people with Celiac Disease, either have very minimal or no outward symptoms. But, this DOES NOT mean that just because you have minimal or no obvious symptoms on the outside, that damage is not still being done on the inside.
This subject of Omission Beer being gluten-free or NOT has been an on-going issue with me, as you can read in my other posts. Now it seems that the largest non-profit celiac support group in America, The Celiac Sprue Association, has: declared, backed, and put their seal of approval on Omission, the barley made ‘gluten removed’ Beer, which is NOT GLUTEN FREE.
HUGE SELL OUT for the Celiac Sprue Association and a bad judgement call. CSA states this on their website,
Products bearing the CSA Recognition Seal are suitable for all those on a celiac diet — sensitive or not so. To assure risk-free choices for all celiacs, products are free of wheat, barley, rye, oats, their crosses and derivatives in product ingredients, processing and packaging. The CSA Seal, currently found on more than 1100 product brands, embodies the CSA’s commitment to a consistent, meaningful, and verifiable definition of products that are the most risk-free for consumers on a celiac diet.
And, Mary Schluckebier, executive director, Celiac Sprue Association states in yesterday’s press release,
“We take very seriously our mission of ‘celiacs helping celiacs.’ Omission Beer clearly meets our strict standards as a risk-free choice for Celiacs.”
Which statement is correct? And what types of methods are you using to gauge “risk free” besides the testing kits for malt beverages that are not approved? What type of research have you done or are doing? How many people’s intestines have you researched over time to conclude that you can absolutely assure the public, with your seal of approval, that it is safe?
Celiac Sprue says they have had their own strictest of tests done on the beer, that even the worst of their Celiac’s can drink it with no problems, “In earning this recognition, Omission Beer has undergone CSA gluten testing methods – the industry’s strictest – and tested well below the FDA standard for gluten-free of 20 ppm.”
Yet the TTB, who is responsible for labeling Omission Beer gluten free says,
There is no TTB approved standard test to VERIFY fermented products are free of gluten.
TTB will allow use of the statement “Processed or Treated or Crafted to remove gluten ,” together with a qualifying statement to inform consumers that:
(1) the product was made from a grain that contains gluten;
(2) there is currently no valid test to verify the gluten content of fermented products; and
(3) the finished product may contain gluten.
Because the current tests used to measure the gluten content of fermented products have not been scientifically validated, such statements may not include any reference to the level of gluten in the product. TTB believes that the qualifying statement is necessary to avoid misleading consumers about the gluten content of these products because of the serious health consequences associated with the consumption of gluten by individuals with celiac disease.
So, what industry would that be CSA, if the TTB & the FDA who regulate ‘the industry’, say there is no scientifically approved standard test? And also let me reiterate,
The following chart compares requirements for the Codex Alimentarius, FDA, and the CSA Recognition Seal definitions.
“TTB believes that the qualifying statement is necessary to avoid misleading consumers about the gluten content of these products because of the serious health consequences associated with the consumption of gluten by individuals with celiac disease.”
|Requirement #4—Ingredients “specially processed to remove gluten”—(e.g. food starch, wheat starch, distilled alcohols and vinegars from WBRO grain sources)|
Codex revised definition
FDA proposed definition
CSA-Recognition Seal definition
|Allowed; gluten content not to exceed 20 ppm in the food as sold or distributed to the consumer||Allowed: gluten content not to exceed 20 ppm in the food||Not allowed—with present available commercial methodology the extent or consistency of the processes is not measurable.|
So again, the contradiction continues. One minute CSA agrees with TTB & FDA saying, ‘gluten removed’ is, “Not allowed with present available commercial methodology the extent or consistency of the processes is not measurable” and now you are saying that the same methodology is ok.
Future: Innovation in agriculture, processing and testing are encouraged.
With validated elimination of celiac toxic amino acid sequences, in the future a product may qualify for the CSA Recognition Seal with celiac special wheat, barley, rye and oats. Promising: Watch for varieties of wheat, barley, rye and oats that are consistently absent of the celiac toxic amino acid sequences. Watch for refined processing systems for wheat, barley, rye or oats that remove the celiac toxic amino acid sequences. Watch for commercial testing procedure advances. As innovative manufacturing processes and gluten-detection methods emerge, the variety of food and beverage choices for celiacs and other gluten sensitive consumers is expanding.
Celiac Toxic Amino Acid Sequence? Again, people are still confused over what gluten free is and now the Celiac Sprue Association wants to throw in, look for food that contains all the ingredients we say you shouldn’t eat like wheat, barley or rye, as long as it is “absent of the celiac toxic amino acid sequence’.
My problem is not with whether a celiac can drink a ‘gluten removed’ beer without getting sick, which we have no idea about because there has been no research to date on this subject. My problem with Omission Beer being labeled gluten free from a trusted Celiac Group, is that it sends the wrong message and confuses an already confused public of what they can and can’t have. We as a community have only just begun to educate and research what Celiac Disease, Gluten Intolerance and Gluten Free is.
*There is a whole community of doctors who still do not believe in or accept Celiac Disease or Gluten Intolerance as being as rampant or as serious as it is becoming.
*We have a whole community of people who have no idea what those terms mean
*And another community who ‘are’ those terms and trying to figure out how to live and what to eat.
As a Celiac Foundation, your first priority is the people it serves. It seems in this situation that CSA has completely missed the mark on what is in the best interest of those people. It is extremely disappointing that you, Celiac Sprue Association, have chosen to put your seal of approval on a product that clearly did not start out gluten free, but through a ‘new innovative’ process that has NOT been scientifically approved, can now self claim they are, with your help.
I believe we are way to early in the research and education process with Celiac Disease & Intolerance to be claiming that an ingredient like barley, which has proven to make us sick if ingested, is ok in any form. I believe it opens the door to more bandwagoners who think they can now claim their barley, wheat, or rye product is gluten free. CSA has set a dangerous precedent by putting the cart before the horse.
I am not saying that maybe one day in the future that these once forbidden ingredients may be again an option, who knows. I am saying that this new innovative testing and process for removing gluten is new, not proven and not backed by any reputable agency like the TTB or FDA.
I do not understand the rush for CSA to make such a resounding call that is now echoing through our community, maybe causing more future bodily damage then ever imagined. My question to the Celiac Sprue Association is, Why Are You In Such A Hurry to put your seal on such a controversial product and Why Would You Not Wait For An Approved Scientific Test backed by any regulatory agency?
I agree, CSA did sell out! Until there is a better understanding of this innovative technology and given approval to, they should have waited. Bottom line is money here, something sounds awfully fishy to me.
I WILL NEVER DRINK THIS CRAP. I’M A CELIAC OF OVER 17 YEARS AND I NEVER HAVE OR WILL DRINK THIS. I REMEMBER MEETING THIS BEER AT A TRADE SHOW IN COLORADO AND TOLD THEM SORRY I WILL NEVER DRINK YOUR PRODUCT DESPITE YOUR CLAIMS… CSA IS NOW A GROUP TO WATCH AS THIS IS SAD ON EVERY LEVEL. THIS IS NOT WHAT THE GLUTEN-FREE MOVEMENT SHOULD BE PROMOTING.
Well written, Kirsten!
CSA mentions a new term “celiac toxic fractions” on its website. This is a fantasy.
Yes, several T-cell reactive peptide epitopes have been identified, mainly in wheat gliadin, but much less is known about glutenin, and very little is known about barley. The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Thank you and Agreed! This was a bad call in my opinion that unfortunately can’t be taken back. Did you happen to catch the confusing statement they put out yesterday?
No, I can’t find it. It doesn’t show up on the CSA site’s press release page (neither does their November 19 release, though…). Could you post a link?
I also note that the CSA web page defining of “gluten-free” has been updated twice this week.
Yes well the statement thy came out yesterday tries to explain that. I’ll post it.
Well researched and thought out post. Amen! Why add to what is already confusing to so many people. I get a reaction from Omission Beer, so something is not working with their process. I can’t imagine how this will affect Celiac patients.
Thank you and exactly my point. I just don’t get their motive behind this.